A Sermon delivered by Reverend Marlin Lavanhar, Senior Minister
At All Souls Unitarian Church in Tulsa, OK
Sunday, Dec. 3, 2006
I spent time with someone recently who
told me he doesn’t see any reason to belong to a religious community. This person has a demanding job, so on Sundays
he likes to sit at home and take it easy. It’s not that he’s anti-religious or anything.
I believe he’d agree with the renowned
American theologian John Lennon, and be for “Whatever gets you through the
night.” In other words, he’d agree that most
folks need something. So, if some people
want to get all gussied-up and come to church, and listen to some churchy music,
and be reassured about the nature of God and life – and that helps them –
great. If other people want to do it
with coffee and the newspaper, or a cigarette, or on the back of a motorcycle
or whatever, that’s great too. The
underlying question is really whether religion is culturally relevant or just a
nice, kind of old-fashioned thing to do.
Of course, if you’re sitting in the
congregation this morning, you probably know something about how being a part
of a church adds value to your individual life. We could talk about intellectual stimulation,
a sense of community, religious education for our children, help in times of
crisis, opportunities to offer service to others, rituals of birth, marriage
and death, spiritual practices, support groups, a chance to hear innovative rap
music, and many other personal benefits of being part of a church. But can we make a serious argument about
cultural relevance? I mean, who are we,
to shape the values of our culture?
Then again, think about Mary, the
mother of Jesus. She was a poor, simple
woman, living in a remote town in some backwater of the Roman
Empire. She had no title,
no status, no formal education. When she
found out she was to bear a son who was destined to change the world she must have
wondered, “Who am I to be the mother of a new creation?”
We too, have to ask ourselves, who
are we – to be bearers of a new creation?
Sure, we’re part of a very historic American church. We trace our heritage back to the pilgrims and
founding mothers and fathers of this nation. And our churches include some of America’s landmark churches in Plymouth
and Salem and Boston
and Quincy and Concord.
But we’re a relatively small band of religious people. I certainly don’t want tourists just driving
past our churches taking pictures and saying that is the church of President John
Adams and Susan B. Anthony, and Horace Mann, and
Henry David Thoreau, and Louisa May Alcott and others. I don’t want to be seen as some quaint little historic
religious community in America.
So today I’m going to talk about
fear. It could be argued that the
origins of religion are in fear. Hundreds
of thousands of years ago, as people experienced seemingly random earthquakes,
floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning, and attacks by wild animals, they sought
explanations and they looked for ways to ward-off such foreboding forces. The explanations for how and why these events occurred,
and the rituals that developed, became the origins of religion.
There were tales of competing gods
and spirits. And superstitions evolved around
how to appease these spirits and evil forces. One of the sad truths about religion today, is
that even though humanity has advanced in our understanding of natural events, many
faiths are still founded on fear-based ideas. Ideas of devils and demons are prevalent, and
people are actually scared of burning in hell if they do not follow the
dictates of a particular faith. With the
exception of politics (which I’ll get to a little later) religion is the only
field left where the propagation of fear is still commonplace and accepted. Here in Oklahoma
we don’t have to look too far to find religions that promote fear in people and
then offer solutions as irrational as the fears themselves.
Let’s keep in mind that if love for
God comes from fear, then it is not love. Because fear coerces love. Imagine if we were to translate certain popular
theologies into human terms. They would be
called abuse. If a person said to
another person, “You must love me and do what I say or I’ll strike you down and
punish you,” that’s the very definition of an abusive relationship. It’s also the definition of a fascist or
coercive political regime – using fear as a form of behavior control.
Making a decision based in fear is
not the same as making a moral decision. You yourself may have grown up in a religion
that filled you with fear as a child. One
of my colleagues tells of a woman in his congregation whose father used to warn
her “if you are not a good girl, the Unitarians will get you.” Of course, she always adds that the Unitarians
eventually did get her, and it has been one of the great blessings of her life.
Even though I have a lot to say about
the negative effects of fear, I also want to argue against another common
belief in our culture regarding fear. That
is, there are people who want to cast out fear and who think that fear is all
bad. We sometimes hear people say that
they never want to act out of fear. Or they
might say, “I feel like I’m allowing my fear to lead me and I know it’s wrong.”
But, as much as I want to denounce the
use of fear for coercion, I also want to defend fear as an important emotion. I want to make the case that by trying to
neglect fear, we have ended up living in terror. We’ve lost our understanding of fear.
On the most basic level, fear is responsible for the survival of our species,
right? If people didn’t feel and act out
of fear upon being confronted by a tiger, or any number of other dangerous
situations, we would have most likely died out as a species long ago. Fear under certain circumstances is an
appropriate response to danger.
Courage is not the absence of fear,
as the cowardly lion in The Wizard of Oz
misunderstood. Courage is the ability to
act in the presence of fear. Certainly today,
most of us don’t live in fear of lightning or attacks by wild animals. But we do fear such things as terrorism, the
effects of global warming, the loss of a job, the collapse of social security,
the encroachment of religion on schools and government and other concerns of
our time that urge us to act. It’s
important that we acknowledge and pay attention to these fears and then act to
try and achieve the best possible outcomes.
In other words, fear has the ability
to move us to positive action. As one of
my teachers explained, “The word emotion has the word motion in it.” Every emotion has a motion that it is directing
us to make. When we ignore an emotion,
or try and bury it, or put it off, eventually we are forced to deal with it. And by the time the suppressed emotion comes
back, it’s usually developed into a distorted form. The distorted emotion can end up causing harm
or confusion rather than the original motion it was intended to create.
We see it all the time with grief,
when a person covers over their grief after a death, or a divorce, or the loss
of a job, the grief eventually rears its head. It can’t be kept at bay forever. And since it wasn’t dealt with constructively
the first time, it usually emerges in surprising, embarrassing and often complicating
ways. The same is true of fear and pain
and other so-called “negative emotions.” They may not feel good, but they are calling
us to act.
Author Michael Meade reminds us that
our country’s leaders knew for a long time about the serious threat of what we
now call global terrorism. But since they,
and we the public, mostly denied and ignored the threat and the fear of it for
so long, we find ourselves in the situation in which we’re now living – with an
excess of fear – global terrorism. Do
you see how the thing we ignored as a culture, we now have in abundance? That’s why we need to find ways to deepen our
understanding and appreciation of fear.
Fear is usually instructing us to
either “Get out of here!” or telling us, “That is exactly where you need to
go.” The complicating thing is that it
can be hard to tell which kind of fear it is. We need to work to recalibrate our intuition
regarding the messages of fear. It’s
similar to the way we, as a culture, have lost touch with what we truly long
for. We have deep longings, but our
media and advertising often work to confuse us about what it is that will
really fulfill us. In the same way, we
as a culture have lost our connection to what fear means for us.
Ours is a religion that long ago
rejected fear of hell in the afterlife and fear of the wrath of God. It is also a religion that has rejected fear
as a motive for taking moral action. We
do not say, “Do the right thing or you will be punished.” We say, “Do the right thing because it is the
loving and ethical thing to do.” But let
us not be a religion that is naïve about the role of fear in our lives. If we try to create a life without fear, we’re
probably not very alive. We may have
created a safety net so tight that we’re trapped by it. I’m not suggesting we allow our lives to be
dominated by fear, but I am suggesting we come to experience it and creatively
live in it.
To love is to risk losing some one
you love. To trust is to risk having
your trust betrayed.
To try something new is to risk failure. Some people work so hard to avoid the fear of
loss or rejection or failure that they do not take risks. They keep the scope of their lives incredibly narrow
and familiar. They choose sameness and
safety so as to avoid being afraid at any cost.
They have developed such a fear of failure, or criticism or intimacy,
that they rarely test the limits of their abilities. Some people fear fear itself so much that they miss
living.
What I’m suggesting is, that we
challenge ourselves to be willing to confront new situations, and take
considered risks so that we can step more fully into our lives. If you fear fear, you must ask yourself what has been the cost in terms of your
relationships, your opportunities? Keep
in mind that in the Bible we find the word fear, but we don’t find the word
risk. The reason is that risk implies
that there’s a degree of chance involved. But in biblical times, people didn’t believe
in chance, their understanding was that everything that happens is God’s will. If you got hit by lightning it was God’s will,
rather than your bad decision to stay on the golf course in a thunderstorm.
I contend that ours is a religion
that does not promote the idea of a God that strikes people down. Nor does it teach that everything that happens
is God’s will. Therefore, the meaning of
faith is not a cosmic agreement in which if you do all the things you are
supposed to do then you have nothing to fear. Rather, ours is a faith that teaches us that
we can handle and even appreciate life despite whatever happens. It is a faith that teaches us that we can act
to change the world. That our lives
matter. It’s a faith that is not afraid
of fear, or based in fear, but one that is not naïve about fear either. And, in a culture that teaches us to reject
fear, this is an important faith we offer.
In a world where preachers and politicians
would still have us live in fear as a means to an end, this is an important
gospel. In a world that seems
constricted by terrorism and divided by fundamentalism, such a faith is not
only culturally relevant, it offers the hope of a new creation. Oh but wait, who are you and I, to be the
bearers of a new creation?
Send Page To a Friend